🎧 Listen to this article:

In May 2026 the EFSA Journal published the NDA Panel opinion on L-alpha-glycerylphosphorylcholine (L-alpha-GPC) from soya phospholipids as a novel food. The Panel concluded that the NF does not raise safety concerns at a maximum of 203.7 mg/day in food supplements — for individuals above 3 years, including pregnant and lactating women. That is a scientific milestone, not a Commission decision to add the ingredient to the Union list.

Key distinction: an EFSA scientific opinion ≠ European Commission authorisation. Until an implementing regulation and listing under Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2470, placing this L-alpha-GPC form on the EU market as a novel food remains unlawful.

1. What exactly did EFSA assess?

Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods and Food Allergens (NDA) assessed the safety of L-alpha-GPC under Regulation (EU) 2015/2283. The opinion carries DOI 10.2903/j.efsa.2026.10008. Title: Safety of L-alpha-glycerylphosphorylcholine (L-alpha-GPC) from soya phospholipids (lecithin) as a novel food pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2015/2283.

The NF is produced by chemical means from phosphatidylcholine (PC)-enriched soya lecithin. Two forms were assessed: a viscous liquid GPC 85% and a powder Alpha Size 100P. Identity, production process, composition and specifications did not raise safety concerns according to the Panel.

Primary source: abstract and metadata confirmed via Crossref for DOI 10.2903/j.efsa.2026.10008 (container: EFSA Journal, May 2026). Full text: https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2026.10008.

2. Which safety data underpin the conclusion?

Assessment elementPanel finding (per opinion abstract)
Proposed useFood supplements, max 203.7 mg/day (= 82.5 mg choline/day)
Target populationIndividuals above 3 years of age, including pregnant and lactating women
NF characteristicsEndogenous PC metabolite; rapidly absorbed; choline source; not nutritionally disadvantageous
Applicant animal dataSeveral limitations; NOAEL 1000 mg/kg bw/day from published 90-day and teratogenicity studies
Margin of exposure (MoE)Children >3 y: 111; adults: 345 — Panel considers sufficient in this case
Final conclusionNF does not raise safety concerns under the proposed conditions of use

These figures come directly from the EFSA opinion abstract. They must not be read as medicinal doses or as proof of clinical efficacy — the novel-food procedure does not replace health-claim assessment.

3. Choline on the label: the 203.7 → 82.5 maths

The proposed maximum use level of 203.7 mg L-alpha-GPC per day corresponds — per the opinion — to 82.5 mg choline per day. For manufacturers that is a concrete figure for nutrition-labelling planning, if and when authorisation conditions and claims rules allow. The novel-food opinion itself does not “unlock” choline health claims.

Separate legal paths: (1) novel food — Regulation (EU) 2015/2283 and Union list 2017/2470; (2) choline nutrition/health claims — Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 and the authorised claims list; (3) vitamin/mineral sources in supplements — Directive 2002/46/EC (a separate list from novel food for this choline form).

4. What still has to happen before EU market access?

  1. EFSA opinion — scientific stage (completed for this application in May 2026).
  2. Commission and Member State decision — an implementing regulation amending the Union list (Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2470).
  3. Listing conditions — including food category, maximum levels, target population and any extra labelling requirements.
  4. National compliance — for example, in Poland, GIS notification if the product is a food supplement.

Only step 2 opens a lawful route to market. Marketing that equates “positive EFSA opinion” with “already legal in the EU” is misleading.

5. Soya origin and allergens — handle carefully

The starting material is PC-enriched soya lecithin. The full EFSA opinion (not only the abstract) indicates a low probability of allergenicity/sensitisation risk, but does not completely exclude reactions in people allergic to soy. Allergen labelling assessment must follow Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011, depending on the final product specification and residual soy protein content.

6. What the opinion does not decide

  • It does not authorise health claims (Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006) — including cognitive or “nootropic” claims.
  • It does not approve other doses or product forms than those assessed (GPC 85% and Alpha Size 100P within this application).
  • It does not list the ingredient on the Union novel-food list — that is the Commission’s role.
  • It does not replace the vitamin/mineral sources list under Directive 2002/46/EC.

7. Practical next steps for manufacturers and importers

  • Monitor the Union list and draft Commission implementing acts.
  • Do not schedule EU production runs that assume immediate marketability solely on the basis of the opinion.
  • Prepare choline maths (82.5 mg from 203.7 mg GPC) for labelling — subject to future authorisation and 1924/2006 compliance.
  • Run soy allergen due diligence (1169/2011) without over-reading the EFSA opinion.
  • If choline health-benefit messaging is planned — a separate substantiation and claim-authorisation strategy.

Conclusion

The NDA opinion on L-alpha-GPC from soya phospholipids is a concrete, positive safety outcome at 203.7 mg/day (82.5 mg choline) for individuals above 3 years, including pregnancy and lactation. The fairest market message is: a scientific green light is not yet a regulatory green light. EU novel-food marketing still requires a Commission implementing regulation.

Educational material, not legal or medical advice. Before market decisions, check the current Union list and obtain product-specific advice.

Primary sources

  1. EFSA NDA Panel. Safety of L-alpha-glycerylphosphorylcholine (L-alpha-GPC) from soya phospholipids (lecithin) as a novel food pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2015/2283. EFSA Journal 2026. DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2026.10008 — primary opinion; source of 203.7 mg/day, 82.5 mg choline, NOAEL 1000 mg/kg bw/day, MoE 111/345.
  2. Regulation (EU) 2015/2283 on novel foods — procedural framework: EFSA opinion, then Commission decision.
  3. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2470 — Union list of novel foods (where the ingredient would be listed, if authorised).
  4. Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 — nutrition and health claims (separate from novel food).
  5. Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 — food information to consumers; Annex II (allergens, including soy) — labelling due-diligence context.